| Author  | 
          Topic:   Why Exhaust is Big Problem on 75-81 for 
            HP  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 01:27 PM                     
             
            I wish I could get all of you at 
            least 300 HP for Christmas for your Corvettes or Chevys. Since I 
            can't afford that, this will have to do.
  Maybe these 2 
            examples will explain best why exhaust is big problem to making HP 
            on 75-81. 
  Example 1 Chevy 350 stock single exhaust w/ 
            cat Backpressure 16.5 psi...........152 hp  Remove cat, & 
            replace stock muffler w/ Cyclone sonic turbo Backpressure 3.5 
            psi.............210 hp Duals & 2 Cyclone sonic turbos 
             Backpressure -1/2psi............224 HP That is 
            +45% Headers not tested.
  Example 2 Camaro 350 81 Z28 
            stock ex.............214 
            hp Headers..............................228 hp Replace cat w/ 
            hi flo cat........241 HP That is over +12% Not tested w/ 
            duals, expect another 15, which would be 256 HP. That would put 
            total about +20%
            Gas milage goes up too.
  Expect you know on a Corvette like 
            yours duals run straight back from manifolds or headers. The iron 
            manifolds are not that bad on stock engines especially if you have 
            to run cats.  The more hp one has the more headers help.
             Now, one can keep the stock carb & cam this to over 300HP 
            easy, even 340 or more if everything else is right! 
             Merry Christmas
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-21-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Jack78 Senior Member
      
            Posts: 1182 From: Burke, Virginia USA now temporarily located 
            in Pensacola, FL,  Registered: Sep 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 01:33 PM                     
             
            Ganey - I live in an area where 
            pollution testing is pretty strict - I could never get away with 
            removing my cat converter or changing from the "Y" pipes to duals. 
            If I go with a better flowing cat (I still have the original) do I 
            gain much? How about if I change mufflers to something with less 
            back pressure? Do headers or different exhaust manifolds make much 
            difference if I have to keep the cat and single exhaust? Thanks. 
Jack
            ------------------ Jack Burke, VA '78 Coupe L-48 bone 
            stock My first - ever
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          andy82 Senior Member
    
            Posts: 382 From: Fremont,CA'82 
            350,AUTO,PS,ACTwo-Tone Registered: May 99   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 01:40 PM                     
             
            Ganey,
            you exclude the 82's in you posting, is this because they have 
            stock headers? Does anybody know how these headers compare to 
            aftermarket ones?
             
             ------------------ Andy Fremont, Northern 
            California Two tone '82, Hypertech Stage II chip Edelbrock 
            cam, K&N air, high flow exaust, Monza style mufflers. Click 
            here for my Vette on the WEB 
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 02:02 PM                     
             
            Jack
            Best Headers & 3" Converters to 2 1/2 duals. I would try 
            to run headers or manifolds, duals, 2 hi flow cat. converters, 
            crossover pipe, Dynomax mufflers.
             If not possible, hi flow cat & try no mufflers or Dynomax. 
            Your ex. manifolds are some of the best available so changing 
            manifolds or to headers is not cost effective.
             Cat & single ex. quiets, remove mufflers, too loud for you, 
            then add even short glasspacks or turbo mufflers. Test- Remove cat 
            & use test pipe to see diff., then you will know what you want.
             See I will never buy a muffler thread in Aftermarket.
             
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
            
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          SuperFast80 Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3021 From: Toronto, CANADA - Frost Beige 
            1980 Registered: Aug 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 02:44 PM                     
             
            Ganey,
            When you talk about 214hp for '81 Z28, where do you get that 
            from? Wasn't the rating 180-190hp?
             The headers give another 15hp, so shouldn't it go to 256 instead 
            of 246?
             Thanks buddy
             ------------------ 1980 355/300hp USS Corvetteforum SSB 
            Gold Crew Damage Control Off. Ltjg
  *Corvette: The 
            Only Sports Car That Matters*
             
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 03:20 PM                     
             
            Andy82
            Headers help mainly at higher rpms. The 82 will not turn high 
            rpms w/ stock Cross Fire manifold so headers would not be cost 
            effective & would expect 0 to minimal gain. Would expect the 
            other exhaust mods to help 82 some.
             Monty is 82 expert & says the fuel system is capable of 300 
            HP, but not the manifold. I posted on 12-2-99 on Cross Fire Mods 
            - Update about using 2 4bl manifold if 300 HP is enough & cam 
            for it. There is also a Holley 670cfm injector & manifold. 
             If you want to run gears or higher stall converter, try this cam 
            TPIS 700-134 221/230 .454/.454 112 LS. 
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-21-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          redvetracr Senior Member
     
            Posts: 637 From: WI Registered: Aug 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 03:39 PM                     
             
            All this talk of headers i have a 
            new set of headman`s WHY CAN`T I SELL THEM HERE !!!! 
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 03:51 PM                     
             
            SuperFast80
            Yes, I think the 81 Z28 was less hp. These figures are engine on 
            dyno complete exhaust, no accessory. Expect you know different dynos 
            will show different figures, so the exact figures are not as 
            important as what the changes show. If someone has not seen this 
            type of info. before, it is enlightening, don't you think?  Yes, 
            you are correct, have fixed to 256.
             Redvetracer Put a description of headers here. I don't think 
            many look in Parts Sale/Wanted section.
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-21-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          fauxrs Senior Member
      
            Posts: 1113 From: San Diego 1978 L-82 A31-PW C60-AC 
            FE7-GYMKANA M21-CLOSE RATIO 4 SPD QBS-255/60-15SBR U81-REAR SPEAKERS 
            ZX2-CONVENIENCE GROUP Registered: Nov 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 04:08 PM                     
             
            Try this.....
            Use your rams horn manifolds or factory "Shorty style" headers 
            from c4. from the manifolds run a 2 1/2" mandrel bent y-pipe (will 
            require fabrication) merge the two legs of the 'y' into a Flowmaster 
            merge pipe. this pipe has a smooth transition from 2- 2 1/2" to 1 - 
            3" - connect to 3" high flow cat - use another flowmaster 'y' and 
            use 2 1/2" pipes to low backpressure mufflers.
             This should be the equal of a dual 2" system. The only difference 
            being the resistance of one cat vs. two. Should be very close though 
            as (1) 3" pipe has greater x-sectional area than (2) 2" pipes.
             All this and its smog legal too!
             This is what I plan to do when I get round to the 
            engine/exhaust/driveline work.
             redvetracer-----send info on headers - i may be interested.
             ------------------ White 1978 L-82 4-Speed Soon to be 
            burgundy
             Zr-1 glass bumper
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          74vette69 Senior Member
     
            Posts: 587 From: Oklahoma Registered: Nov 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 04:32 PM                     
             
            Put a straw in youre mouth and 
            blow.Now pinch the center of the straw with youre fingers and 
            walla!You have just installed a catalytic converter! If what goes up 
            must come down,then on a motor it is ,what gets in must come out 
              
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          andy82 Senior Member
    
            Posts: 382 From: Fremont,CA'82 
            350,AUTO,PS,ACTwo-Tone Registered: May 99   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 04:58 PM                     
             
            Ganey,
            what I meant the the '82 seems to me the only shark that has 
            stock headers installed from factory. Don't know if they are good 
            but maybe that is one reason the '82 is measured 200hp instead of 
            lees hp in the previous years.  And BTW, you are right, the other 
            exaust mods helped alot!
             ------------------ Andy Fremont, Northern 
            California Two tone '82, Hypertech Stage II chip Edelbrock 
            cam, K&N air, high flow exaust, Monza style mufflers. Click 
            here for my Vette on the WEB 
              [This message has been edited by andy82 (edited 12-21-1999).]
            
 [This message has been edited by andy82 (edited 
            12-21-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          redvetracr Senior Member
     
            Posts: 637 From: WI Registered: Aug 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 05:03 PM                     
             
            NEW NEVER BOLTED TO ENGINE Hedman 
            under chassis hedders 63-82 small block race style (uses 
            reversion plates)has adjustable collector length,1 3/4"ID tubes 
            Quality piece $490./Jegs(Hedman#65330)will take $290.+UPS  
            [This message has been edited by redvetracr (edited 
            12-21-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          SuperFast80 Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3021 From: Toronto, CANADA - Frost Beige 
            1980 Registered: Aug 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 05:13 PM                     
             
            74vette69, well put.
            Ganey, you are damn right! The difference one can make with 
            exhaust upgrades on these so-called 'smog motors' is incredible.
             BTW, I have been kicking around this theory for a while now. See 
            if you can follow and then comment:
             If we look at the '71 hp ratings (the only ones that showed both 
            net and gross) we see 330 gross for the LT1 and 255 net. I know it 
            is not an exact science but the conversion rate seems to be 
            approximately 1:0.77. So lets accept a rounder 20% power loss with 
            net.
             Using that, lets convert the net hp ratings of the L48s from 
            1975-1980 to approximate gross as well as add 20% for true duals and 
            no cats (so as to even the score with the 68-74s):
             Year Net Appr. Gross True duals gr. 1975 165 206 247 1976 
            180 225 270 1977 180 225 270 1978 185 231 277 1979 195 244 
            292 1980 190 238 287
             Now if you look at the base hp for 1968 through 1971 (gross 
            numbers), you will see base numbers from 270 to 300. If we take 
            these numbers at face value, the L48 is as good as any base engine 
            offered previously and does not deserve the bad rap. 
             After all, it was the smog laws that put on more accessories but 
            the engine didn't change (yes, I knoe compression dropped but that 
            didn't do much).
             What do you think?
             ------------------ 1980 355/300hp USS Corvetteforum SSB 
            Gold Crew Damage Control Off. Ltjg
  *Corvette: The 
            Only Sports Car That Matters*
             
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 06:02 PM                     
             
            Andy
            Previous years 75-80 have ratings for L82 from 205 to 230 
            HP. Highest net is 255 HP @ 5600 72 350 no cat. w/ duals.
             Highest small block gross is 375 @ 6200 327.
             I have no exp. w/ 82, don't have size info. on your ex., do not 
            expect your ex. is better than the rams horn manifolds.
             Consider this I beat new GTOs, etc. repeatedly w/ 57 Chevys w/ 
            283, 307, 302, w/ 30-30 solid lifter cam, dual ex., rams horn 
            manifolds like Corvette has. Stock 57 carbs, aftermarket air filter, 
            supertuned. Stock gears about 3.36. Used 4.56 Posi on the fast 
            cars.
             Why not tell what you did & results for 82 guys? 
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
            
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          andy82 Senior Member
    
            Posts: 382 From: Fremont,CA'82 
            350,AUTO,PS,ACTwo-Tone Registered: May 99   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 07:00 PM                     
             
            Ganey,
            quote "Highest net is 255 HP @ 5600 72 350 no cat. w/ duals."
             There you have it: true dual exaust w/o cat and headers seems to 
            be the ultimate solution. Note: HP Numbers also dropped significant 
            with intro of smog legal equippment.
             I for my part have to be smog legal, but noticed a difference by 
            just changing to high flow cat and tips instead of rear 
            mufflers. I'd love to see dyno results although I can't compete 
            to many other folks here in the forum but just for the heck of 
            it... 
             ------------------ Andy Fremont, Northern 
            California Two tone '82, Hypertech Stage II chip Edelbrock 
            cam, K&N air, high flow exaust, Monza style mufflers. Click 
            here for my Vette on the WEB 
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 07:03 PM                     
             
            SuperFast80
            Based on more info., a long time ago figured for engines rated 
            net about 200-325 HP one could take net & add 30%. Now you 
            want to add for duals, I think your 20% dyno may be optimistic. See 
            Ex. 2 the 20% included headers. 15% may be a lot to add. If 
            one adds 30% then adds 15% the total is about the same as you have. 
            So different methods about same total results!
  PS I have been 
            running way behind on this thread because it takes so long to key in 
            answers. 
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
            
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          fauxrs Senior Member
      
            Posts: 1113 From: San Diego 1978 L-82 A31-PW C60-AC 
            FE7-GYMKANA M21-CLOSE RATIO 4 SPD QBS-255/60-15SBR U81-REAR SPEAKERS 
            ZX2-CONVENIENCE GROUP Registered: Nov 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-21-1999 08:37 PM                     
             
            redvetracr:
            much more header than I need unfortunatly.   
             ------------------ White 1978 L-82 4-Speed Soon to be 
            burgundy
             Zr-1 glass bumper
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          JK78SA Senior Member
    
            Posts: 190 From: Waukesha WI Registered: Oct 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 02:40 AM                     
             
            Ganey, Excellent thread you 
            started. Thanks. I've got a '78 L48 w/ stock exhaust sytem w/ Walker 
            Super Turbo mufflers. The quietness has been driving me nuts for the 
            last 3 years, so removed the mufflers & went to the local 
            muffler shop & had them make me some replacement pipes for 
            $30.00. Car sounds alot better & I noticed a slight improvement 
            in lower end torque. However, I would like to lose the cat. But the 
            guy at the muffler shop highly suggested I not run w/o a cat. They 
            are really cracking down on emmissions enforcement in my area. He 
            had heard recently that 2 vette owners that live in the same county 
            as I do got pulled over. The cops checked out there cars (no cat) 
            & both got fined $5000.00. One guy had to get an attorney to 
            keep from having his registration yanked. So I guess I'll have to 
            keep legal & continue to contribute to the acid rain problem 
            (create more sulferic acid). What kind or brand of high flow 
            convertor would you recommend for my application & how much HP 
            would I end up with? Thanks for your help & expertise. John 
            
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          chevyman Senior Member
    
            Posts: 155 From: Meriden, Connecticut Registered: Dec 
            1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 05:49 AM                 
             
            I also have a 75 and replaced my 
            exhaust with a dynomax system. The only thing with the cat is I 
            replaced it with a newer monolythic style and gutted it out. IT 
            still passes emmision and satifies the emission cops. Sounds 
            awesome. Maybe you can do the same.
            ------------------ Eddie Hernandez 1975 Corvette 
            Coupe Meriden, CT
             
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 10:13 AM                     
             
            John
            Thanks. http://www.randomtechnology.com/ 
            is supposed to be the best. Suggest asking them, they have e-mail at 
            site.
             I think you would be much better off to run duals & 2. 
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-22-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Pacha Senior Member
   
            Posts: 60 From: Buenos Aires, Argentina Registered: Dec 
            1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 11:43 AM                     
             
            Would a "shorty" style header and 
            ´69 side exhaust be a good performer combo? It will give you a 2 
            1/2 dual side exhaust and the posibility to use repro fiberglass 
            covers so you don´t get burnt as with hooker side pipes.
            
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          fastguy unregistered  | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 12:06 PM                 
             
            This has been a great thread. In 
            every vehicle I have upgraded exhaust on, I have seen an 
            improvement. I went from the cheesy manifolds and Y-pipe with single 
            muffler tiny tailpipe on my 67 350 Camaro to cheap Summit headers 
            ($75) and 2 1/2 dual exhaust with sonic turbos. HUGE difference. I 
            am going to get another set of Summit headers for the Vette with 2 
            1/2 duals. I probably won't use a converter set since no one checks 
            cars that old, especially a car that has antique plates. On my other 
            cars, I will admit that I have converter "shells". Its basically a 
            hollowed converter. One car even had a fake converter bottom welded 
            onto a straight section of pipe! Don't try this at home.
            ------------------ George DiGregorio 75 Stingray L48 
            SuperT-10 Milford, MA
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Demar Senior Member
    
            Posts: 489 From: Terre Haute, IN USA Registered: Apr 
            99   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 12:09 PM                     
             
            I've eliminated the cat converter 
            and am running straight dual chambered exhaust. Would this be 
            equivilent to the dual turbo cyclones?
            ------------------ Demar 76 L-48 
             http://www.angelfire.com/in2/demar/index.html Terre Haute, 
            Indiana
             
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 12:33 PM                     
             
            Pacha
            I don't run that type because I want 4into1 full length headers 
            for max. power & rpms, the headers point straight back & the 
            pipes go straight through the crossmember & straight back making 
            gentle curves around the spare. There is also a crossover pipe.
             This is ideal. There are about 2 ways to improve this. One is to 
            remove spare & avoid the gentle curves. The other can not 
            disclosed since it needs to be sold to an exhaust co.
             I think to run the side pipes you must really like them. All the 
            turns does not help. One should run a crossover pipe w/ it. Expect 
            the shorty headers to be a little better than the rams horn 
            manifolds. Still, it will work & a lot of guys like them. If you 
            did a topic on this probably the side pipe guys would say do it, ask 
            about pros & cons. Anyway I am not trying to talk you out of it. 
            At least you don't have to worry about cats, however those sharp 
            turns are probably as bad. 
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
            
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 01:11 PM                     
             
            Demar
            Having the muffler at the end is ideal. Total ex. system loss 
            w/ above system w/ headers & turbo mufflers can be less than 15! 
              
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
            
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          JADEE Senior Member
    
            Posts: 168 From: MAXVILLE, FLORIDA USA Registered: Oct 
            1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 01:46 PM                     
             
            GANEY Would this formula also 
            work on my 79 Camaro 350 cu. bored 30 over. If so what would be the 
            h\p if my duals run straight back to mufflers which are 84 turbo 
            type mufflers. I don't have any other specs. except it's using a 
            QJET. THANKS AND MERRY XMAS AND HAPPY HOLIDAYS AROUND YOUR HOUSE. 
             JERRY 79 CAMARO 76 VETTE L-82 SOME MODS
            ------------------
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 03:25 PM                     
             
            Jerry
            I have had a Firebird 400 Conv. & a Trans Am similar to your 
            Camaro, however it has been years. Expect you know you have the 
            large live axle in the way that you will have to loop over to be 
            legal. Basically you want to make as straight as possible, gentle 
            curves as possible for any car. Anyway will not match Vette system.
             One way to deal with the live axle cars is to run pipe straight 
            back, add mufflers & forget the tailpipes over axle. I barely 
            attached the mufflers to pipes & suspended the mufflers front 
            & rear so that a hard jab on the throttle would blow the 
            mufflers off & leave suspended out of the way. This is 
            especially good if one does not have headers. This should be done 
            after staging. Too late now, Gotcha!  
              ------------------ Cheers Ganey
            
 CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-22-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          DaveL82 Senior Member
    
            Posts: 377 From: Plano TX Registered: Jul 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 03:41 PM                     
             
            I used to see vette rams horn 
            manifolds advertised in Circle Track magazine a few years ago that 
            were ported. These were for classes that required stock type 
            manifolds but haven't see them lately.
            I have an 80 model vette which runs the exhuast under the 
            transmission crossmember. This makes it real easy to swap from stock 
            type exhaust to the so called off highway duals in about an hour. I 
            can change back quickly if needed.
             I have a ZZ4 motor thats runs great but not sure it the stock 
            manifolds are much of a restriction. Hedman has headers that are 
            supposed to be emissions legal (should come with the required 
            certification) for C3's vettes.  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-22-1999 07:16 PM                     
             
            fastguy
            On your Vette the Dynomax Cyclone headers flow great & fit 
            great!
             I am glad you like this topic, anybody else?
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-22-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          JADEE Senior Member
    
            Posts: 168 From: MAXVILLE, FLORIDA USA Registered: Oct 
            1999   | 
            posted 
            12-23-1999 03:51 AM                     
             
            GANEY EXCELLENT TOPIC AND A 
            WEALTH OF INFORMATION JERRY
            ------------------
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ken73 Senior Member
     
            Posts: 840 From: Houston, TX Registered: Aug 2000   | 
            posted 
            12-23-1999 11:12 AM                     
             
            I'll say this much; Ganey's 
            claims of better performance with better exhaust is VERY valid! I 
            had the original mufflers on my '82 that finally rotted out - and 
            just with very low restriction (i.e. rusted out) stock mufflers, I 
            had tons of "power" (at least I sure felt it) and once I had the new 
            mufflers put on, I noticed a SEVERE drop in power. (Stock 
            replacement mufflers.) I'll be investing in better exhaust at a 
            later date, but I can assure you the '82 suffers from highly 
            restrictive exhaust as well. The catalytic converter is somewhat 
            restrictive too, even though it is one of GM's "high-flow" units. I 
            think the idea of doing a higher-flowing Y-pipe and one of the 
            RandomTechnology cats is a great idea for the '82, along with some 
            higher flowing mufflers.
            Ken  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          74vette69 Senior Member
     
            Posts: 587 From: Oklahoma Registered: Nov 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-23-1999 11:12 AM                     
             
            Ganey that loose muffler idea is 
            pretty sneaky!   I 
            read in July 99 Car Craft about a 1980 corvette sleeper running in 
            the nines with cast iron manifolds.He used motorized butterflies 
            with his exhaust to divert from from 1/78 mufflers to Borla 
            XR-1s.The car has stock interior,Eagle GTs recapped into cheater 
            slicks,Q-jet,and 300hp nitrous. 
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Monty Senior Member
       
            Posts: 2949 From: Park Ridge, IL  Registered: Feb 
            1999   | 
            posted 
            12-23-1999 11:23 AM                     
             
            When I had the crossfire motor 
            still in my car I had full 1 5/8" headers, no cat and true dual 
            exhuast with flowmaster mufflers. In my opinion, the improvement 
            over stock is negligible, especially considering the cost and time 
            involved switching over. This was also in conjunction with an 
            aftermarket cam, 1.6" full rollers, K&N's, ignition upgrades.
            The problem is that the intake manifold's intake port, where it 
            meets the head, is about the same size, maybe even smaller in some 
            areas as the stock, stainless steel headers. The stock headers can 
            be improved somewhat with a little grinding work. The welds where 
            the individual tubes are welded to the flange are sloppy, blocking 
            at least a full 1/4" of the tubes. With a die grinder, this weld can 
            be grinded flush, the air tubescan be grinded flush on the inside, 
            and some general port matching will improve flow. The stock cat, as 
            long as it isn't plugged or melted will flow plenty for the 
            crossfire.
             If I were just starting to mod a crossfire, the first thing I'd 
            do is open up the intake manifold to match the heads, at least as 
            much as is possible with out going through the bottom of the 
            manifold. Comp Cams makes a .450" cam for the L83, this along with 
            porting will produce the biggest improvement, in my opinion, without 
            pissing the ecm off.
             ------------------
  1982 White 383 DFI SuperRam Park 
            Ridge, IL  11.895/120.121mph 438HP/478TQ 
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-23-1999 12:00 PM                     
             
            Monty, Ken73, & Andy82
            Thanks for adding your 82 experiences. What is dia. & 
            length of 82 stock header pipes? I was thinking about the intake 
            problem & guessed the dual 4 manifold would work good. Have 
            you seen this from Brandon vette84? http://www.flash.net/~famviz/monster 
             He posted in Aftermarket, CrossFire/Carb Conversion, maybe he 
            will tell more of his exp. Sounds like he did not cam it.
              74Vette69
            
 Familiar w/ that Vette, besides Q-J, etc. it is running auto 
            & 3.08, can build.  
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
             
             [This message has been edited by Ganey (edited 
            12-23-1999).]  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Senseiearl unregistered  | 
            posted 
            12-23-1999 04:19 PM                 
             
            fauxrs-They're many suitable 
            headers for this car. Pricing on the same header from different 
            companies can vary by $200. As an example, I just order Heddman 
            Headers 68301, smog legal from Summit racing for $234.99. Jegs was 
            $25 higher and one company wanted $400.
            Dynomax is good too. The reason I didn't go with them is that 
            they don't make a California smog legal header for my 78.
             ------------------ http://www.orderofthedragon.com/ 
             91 green convertible Flowmasters Power Chip K & N 
            Filter 1978 Pace Car Eldelbrock manifold, cam & 
            timing chain, Magnum Roller Rocker Arms, modified exhaust 300+ 
            HP Sensei Earl Bakersfield, Ca.
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            12-26-1999 05:51 PM                     
             
            One thing that was mentioned 
            without an example was that the more HP you have, the more headers 
            help. At the 300 hp level with iron manifolds, headers will increase 
            to about 350 HP.
             Sensei Earl
            
 Nice to see ya over 300! 
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/ 
            
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Monty Senior Member
       
            Posts: 2949 From: Park Ridge, IL  Registered: Feb 
            1999   | 
            posted 
            12-27-1999 03:22 PM                     
             
            Ganey,
            The 82 stainless steel headers have a diameter ranging from 1 
            1/4" to about 1 1/2". The primary's are narrowed at the 90 degree 
            bend a little, and the sloppy welding narrows it quite alot, but 
            that can be corrected with some grinding. The length is comparible 
            to a set of shorties, about 1-2" above the oil pan flange.
             ------------------
  1982 White 383 DFI SuperRam Park 
            Ridge, IL  11.895/120.121mph 438HP/478TQ 
             
  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          Ganey Senior Member
       
            Posts: 3792 From: Texas CORVETTE 77 385 C.I. Registered: 
            Apr 1999   | 
            posted 
            01-06-2000 08:19 PM                     
             
            Monty
            Thanks. They say better late than never!  
             ------------------ Cheers Ganey
             CORVETTE 77 385CI 6.3L Hi-Perf. Sus.  http://ganeys.home.sprynet.com/  
            IP: 
            Logged  | 
        
          fauxrs Senior Member
      
            Posts: 1113 From: San Diego 1978 L-82 A31-PW C60-AC 
            FE7-GYMKANA M21-CLOSE RATIO 4 SPD QBS-255/60-15SBR U81-REAR SPEAKERS 
            ZX2-CONVENIENCE GROUP Registered: Nov 1999   | 
            posted 
            01-07-2000 10:24 AM                     
             
            Thanks Sensei..   
            I'm still planning my exhaust and engine mods for after the paint 
            which starts this weekend (prep, body work & prime) once the 
            paint is on then I will start engine/exhaust mods.
            I'm writing everything down that i learn here on the forum and 
            including it in my specs for my upgrades. I have set engine specs 
            down (even posted them on my web site) but I think they will be 
            changing for a stroked 350 (3.835" stroke - approx. 396 cu in) 
            torque monster instead of the more revvy 355 i was planning.
             engine specs can be found at http://www.geocities.com/MotorCity/Downs/3057/enginespecs.html 
              
            
 ------------------ White 1978 L-82 4-Speed Soon to be 
            burgundy
             Zr-1 glass bumper  
            IP: 
            Logged  |